Innovation is not a new thing

What’s really news in didactics? It’s too long we talk about “innovation” but we don’t know if we really need that.

What we really need is new people who tells different stories.

We invocate “innovation” when we feel tired of meeting non very sensitive people on our way. New technology helps people to tell new stories, for sure. But when we say “new” we don’t think of “used”, but we think of “users”.

What do we need to call it “teaching”?

In Italy we call “DAD” (didattica a distanza, something like teaching by distance) and it means when a teacher uses web to provide content or learning tools. For many years the schools use that in 10-50% perceptual range. Since lockdown caused by covid-19 and as the schools are closed, the school manage 100% didactics by distance.

Thought about 70% of students regret the school in presence, it’s been an important chance to increase digital skills. Many teachers do.

And many school are proud to declare they are ON LINE and cover 100% of school time by the web, thanks to some platforms like WebEx, Google Meet or Microsoft Teams. All we need the platforms to connect, it’s true. But are we sure to call it “teaching”, just because we are connected and look at a webcam??

Is away-teaching real “teaching”?

Some reflections about didactics at distance? Are we sure learning-brain behaves on the same way if learns in a 100% TIC situation? Do pupils really learn through a screen all day long? How? How can we plan our lesson  by an “away teaching”-size??

Some good reflections in webinars by https://www.fem.digital/

Some practical ideas here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vZ-Rk5E7Hv9Ow7PQl95IhdRmIIfwQWbzaGVo9aoV1do